Thanks for these links about tagging. I was thrilled to go through them today. I was particularly interested in Connotea, edited by the Nature group, that I navigate daily online. I registered to Connotea and it’s a nice paradigm (even if after a quick test it appears somewhat cumbersome to use). On the tagging blog I was delighted to read the interviews of David Weinberger ( del.icio) and Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia). I find Wikipedia more interesting because it is a way to organize an information already digested whereas Connotea regroups relatively raw scientific information. I think that another task is to be able to access an information already processed (learned and in fact understood) at a personal or group level. That’s what the companies inxight and intellisophic are trying to do. Have a look at those links (watch the flash demo at inxight) and tell me what you think. I tend to think intuitively that the inxight approach combined with a Wikibook concept and tagging capabilities would be to develop for any issue in particular in the medical field.

Well, have a good night.

Jerome

http://www.inxight.com/
http://www.intellisophic.com/aboutus/index.php
http://www.montague.com/review/myths.html