<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life doesn&#8217;t go in Straight Lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/</link>
	<description>small bites to think talk &#038; walk</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Shell</title>
		<link>http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/#comment-18311</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/#comment-18311</guid>
		<description>Stories move in circles. They don't move in straight lines.
So it helps if you listen in circles. There are stories insidestories
and stories between stories, and finding your way through them
is as easy and as hard as finding your way home.
And part of the finding is the getting lost.
And when you're lost, you start to look around and to listen.

Corer Fischer, Albert Greenberg, and Naomi Newman
of A Traveling Jewish Theatre, Coming from a Great Distance - discovered via  http://www.deenametzger.com/ discovered via exploring the Storyfield Conference website - I would like to learn more about and from deena somehow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stories move in circles. They don&#8217;t move in straight lines.<br />
So it helps if you listen in circles. There are stories insidestories<br />
and stories between stories, and finding your way through them<br />
is as easy and as hard as finding your way home.<br />
And part of the finding is the getting lost.<br />
And when you&#8217;re lost, you start to look around and to listen.</p>
<p>Corer Fischer, Albert Greenberg, and Naomi Newman<br />
of A Traveling Jewish Theatre, Coming from a Great Distance - discovered via  <a href="http://www.deenametzger.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.deenametzger.com/?referer=');">http://www.deenametzger.com/</a> discovered via exploring the Storyfield Conference website - I would like to learn more about and from deena somehow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marge Schiller</title>
		<link>http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>marge Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>I want to hear your thoughts on Mandalas- the shell is one of the classics. Just ame back from a great graphic recording seminar that suggested 7 ways of recording material.....
Posters
Lists
Cluster Diagrams
Matrixes/Models
Organization diagrams
Flow Charts
and Mandalas 
 going from the simplest to the most complex-
 I am experimenting with starting each morning designing a mandala for the day (kind of a blog with an audience of one:me)

so tell me  what you think and tell me how you are.
Happy Passover.
Marge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to hear your thoughts on Mandalas- the shell is one of the classics. Just ame back from a great graphic recording seminar that suggested 7 ways of recording material&#8230;..<br />
Posters<br />
Lists<br />
Cluster Diagrams<br />
Matrixes/Models<br />
Organization diagrams<br />
Flow Charts<br />
and Mandalas<br />
 going from the simplest to the most complex-<br />
 I am experimenting with starting each morning designing a mandala for the day (kind of a blog with an audience of one:me)</p>
<p>so tell me  what you think and tell me how you are.<br />
Happy Passover.<br />
Marge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustus</title>
		<link>http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalieshell.com/2006/03/23/life-doesnt-go-in-straight-lines/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>it's a good entry Natnat.  And thank your grandmother again, it had a real impact on me. A simple but true point.  And thank you Lord that life 'doesnâ€™t go in straight lines darling...'  Although, as you say we like linear, or rather patterns.  They bring warmth, and 'it was meant to be' conversations with others and ourselves.  I'm unclear whether or not it's a deliberate avoidance on our parts; this blindness to the irregular path of our lives.  Is it because there is too much to explain, too much to make a coherent story from, when looking at the micro level?  Perhaps we just like to observe the end effect: the macro? That is, simply, it could be a matter of chosen perspective. Because like Brownian motion there are two apparently contradictory qualities. That which is chaotic (at a molecule level) and that which is an observable order (at the collective level).  So we miss the chaos only to see that over time we have expanded, evenly.  

p.s. I think I am saying what you have already... perhaps I just wanted to say Brownian motion just the once today? Humm... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a good entry Natnat.  And thank your grandmother again, it had a real impact on me. A simple but true point.  And thank you Lord that life &#8216;doesnâ€™t go in straight lines darling&#8230;&#8217;  Although, as you say we like linear, or rather patterns.  They bring warmth, and &#8216;it was meant to be&#8217; conversations with others and ourselves.  I&#8217;m unclear whether or not it&#8217;s a deliberate avoidance on our parts; this blindness to the irregular path of our lives.  Is it because there is too much to explain, too much to make a coherent story from, when looking at the micro level?  Perhaps we just like to observe the end effect: the macro? That is, simply, it could be a matter of chosen perspective. Because like Brownian motion there are two apparently contradictory qualities. That which is chaotic (at a molecule level) and that which is an observable order (at the collective level).  So we miss the chaos only to see that over time we have expanded, evenly.  </p>
<p>p.s. I think I am saying what you have already&#8230; perhaps I just wanted to say Brownian motion just the once today? Humm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
