The smell of melons once more drifted across the stage.
- Thursday Next The Eyre Affair by the fabulous Jasper Fforde
I was just on Facebook commenting as you do, and I realised they had removed my OK button. Huh? In it’s place in tiny text was a little note saying “press Enter to post your comment”.
Now admittedly this is a small change but it got my thinking about buttons and keys. And texture and feeling. All this new technology at our finger tips, but no differentiation between things.
So I click enter for a comment, enter for a sentence divider…
I click the single round button on my iphone, the rest of the buttons are on touch so they all FEEL the same. There’s no difference between calling my mother, sending an email or playing a game.
There is no sensory difference between my experience.
It’s just well…boring and well…slightly off. I could say I’m hanging on to the old and that’s probably true. And I could also add I’m viewing this through the eyes of someone looking at UI (user interface) but really…don’t you kind of miss buttons and knobs. Even my kitchen cabinets are push and click.
And keys!? My friends car has what looks like a memory stick that you insert and then push a “Go” button…no turn no weird sounds
…it all just…
Smells like melons.
(ie it all seems good and great but “smells slightly wrong”).
Sometimes it can be hard to articulate quite how much I feel that things are changing and those changes are speeding up. Even our (and my own) shift to visuals over words^.
My friend posted the link to the images below on Facebook*.
It portrays visually what I feel.
Things are changing. Fast.
These images are of Mongolian villagers documented by A Yin – the first image is only 2years difference. The second, 5 years. That is a very short space of time.
See more here
Some other examples I’m observing in myself:
- ^Movement to a visual & oral/aural (sound) world – for instance, when was the last time you ‘told a joke’ rather than were sent a joke – comic, cartoon, youtube link
this was foreseen by thinkers like Marshall McLuhan
- Reliance on difference sources for media *another change, how I receive/gather information eg Facebook
- (Over)reliance on smart phone
- “Chatting” online / sms vs calling someone ie voice!
- Shopping online
- Less and less waiting to find things out: “oh I don’t know” “let’s look it up” get out smart phone, read wikipedia entry
- Wikipedia – it’s less than 10 years old!!
- Speed at which I expect things to happen
- Storing documents on google docs / email vs on desktop/computer or shock horror, printing them!
- Typing over writing
- Less and less need to commit things to memory
- Patience and appetite for ‘long’ reading
- Shorter and shorter times between changes – shorter time lines, product life cycles, release of new media, new products, new sites
- “Long term” thinking means 1 year, maybe 2…not 5years, not 20, or 100….
…
The list continues.
I am watching. And observing.
As a communicator I am always looking to define myself with clarity.
And hearing of this term was quite a relief. Firstly, fractals are very pretty.
They also are 1. very hard to condense into a precise definition
2. they work on many levels 3. fractal geometry is a branch of mathematics that bridges many areas from art to science and technology.
And that was how I first came into contact with Benoît Mandelbrot, the man responsible for coining the term fractal.
Suffice to say that I do not know Mandelbrot personally, but I am deeply thankful for his discovery of this pretty damn amazing branch of mathematics.
And also, now having read his biography, also much charmed by the innovative maverick he seemed to be!
“If you take the beginning and the end, I have had a conventional career,” he said, referring to his prestigious appointments in Paris and at Yale. “But it was not a straight line between the beginning and the end. It was a very crooked line.”